Sunday, March 21, 2010

TorahBytes: Only Judaism Explains Christianity (Zav)

This is the law of the burnt offering, of the grain offering, of the sin offering, of the guilt offering, of the ordination offering, and of the peace offering, which the LORD commanded Moses on Mount Sinai, on the day that he commanded the people of Israel to bring their offerings to the LORD, in the wilderness of Sinai. (Vayikra / Leviticus 7:37,38; ESV)

If you know anything about Christianity, you are aware that it makes much about the death of its central character. His was no typical martyr's death. He didn't die for a cause. The leaders of his day did him in to prevent an uprising of the common people. The Jewish people in the Land of Israel had a delicate relationship with the world power at that time. They enjoyed basic religious freedom as long as they didn't upset the political situation. While there were some among them who believed in armed rebellion, the majority looked to God alone to deliver them from foreign oppression, much like in the days of Moses. So for the leadership it was disconcerting to see how the young rabbi from Galilee was getting the masses stirred up with talk of the Kingdom of God and performing miracles. To seriously consider whether or not he truly was the Messiah was too much for their leaders to handle. Out of fear of what the Romans might do, they decided he had to be stopped. Upon his arrest and unjust execution, his followers were scattered and completely discouraged. It would not be until after Yeshua's resurrection and the outpouring of the Ruach Hakodesh (English: Holy Spirit) that his followers would have the courage to fulfill the mission to which God had called them.


So it wasn't Yeshua's death that spurred his followers on. Yet they would come to understand that it was his death that made all the difference. Remember, it was not as if his death inspired them to action. Far from it. It actually profoundly discouraged them. His death also brought about no change of heart from his detractors. It would only be later that his followers came to understand that it was through his death that those who believe in him have forgiveness of sins.


Today, two thousand years later, the forgiveness of sins through the death of Yeshua continues to be the central message of Christianity. But what is the basis of such a concept? From where does such an idea come from? How could it be that the shedding of blood would make such a difference? To be able to answer that question, we need to see that this didn't happen out of nowhere. It is not as if God just did this unexpected thing, and then somehow expect people to understand that through Yeshua's death they could be forgiven.


Yeshua's death was a Jewish sacrifice. While sacrifice was common in the ancient world, Jewish sacrifice had been particularly prescribed by God to teach his people the reality of sin and forgiveness. Through the Jewish sacrificial system, God's people learned what was holy and what was not. They learned about the seriousness of righteousness and morality. They were taught about the sacredness of blood, the value of purity, and the importance of restitution. By the time Yeshua came, the people of Israel knew that God provided sacrifice as the means to cover sin and maintain their relationship with him. At the same time the many sacrifices reminded the people of their sin and their need for forgiveness.


When Yeshua rose from the dead, his followers began to understand the implications of his death. All that they had learned and anticipated due to the Jewish sacrificial system prepared them to proclaim forgiveness of sins in his name to all nations.


So today believers in Yeshua can return to Torah portions like this week's and plumb the depths of the significance of the Messiah's death on our behalf. Everything that has kept people from intimately knowing God: our sin, our guilt, our impurity, our immorality, our ignorance, our self-centeredness, our unfaithfulness - has all been resolved through the death of Yeshua.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just a thought; would it not be more correct to say that the law explains Christianity rather than Judaism explains Christianity?

While the Jews were custodians of the law and to them gentiles owe a huge debt. However, it is the law that explains the sacrifice and the law is of God not of people.

Alan Gilman said...

I was using the term "Judaism" in the narrow sense of the revelation of God as given to the Jewish people.

tatankachief said...

Shalom,

Please help me here, I'm a bit confused. You say that, "Yeshua's death was a Jewish sacrifice. While sacrifice was common in the ancient world, Jewish sacrifice had been particularly prescribed by God to teach his people the reality of sin and forgiveness." I wholeheartedly agree! But what about the rest of The Holy One's people?

I understand what you're saying in the context that Judah was the predominant tribe at the time. However you go on to say that "Jewish sacrifice had been particularly prescribed by God...". Wasn't the Law given to ALL the tribes and those who chose to sojourn with them? Weren't the instructions for ALL who believe in The Lord of Hosts and His Son Yeshua? Wouldn't that make the law of sacrifice for all who believe and not just Judah?

Thank you for your weekly offerings, I enjoy them very much.

Ran Ricard

Alan Gilman said...

In common parlance the term "Jewish" refers to that which is associated with the people of Israel, not just the people of the tribe of Judah from with the term is originally derived.

tatankachief said...

Thank you Rabbi for your quick response. I have another question if I may. I have been studying some work that espouses the theory that the Two Houses (Judah and Ephraim) have not yet been reunited as is prophesied in Scripture. The proponents go on to state, using as proof Paul's epistle to the Ephesians, all who believe in Messiah Yeshua become Israelites (my very abbreviated paraphrase .. sorry ;o).

They also subscribe to the possibility that the majority of the Christian world today 'could' be the descendants of those tribes of the House of Ephraim /Israel. They do state that only our Heavenly Father knows that for sure, but they do put that thought in the forefront of their teachings.

My question is this; Whether that is true concerning Christians or not, once we accept Messiah Yeshua as our Redeemer, shouldn't we be obedient to Him?

Since He said that He did not come to abolish the Law ... that until Heaven and Earth were gone the Law would stay ... wouldn't / shouldn't ALL believers be living a Torah obedient life?

Thank you for engaging me in this discussion.

Ran

Alan Gilman said...

You mention several things.

First, I am not a rabbi. Only Yeshua the Messiah is worthy for that title.

Second, the two house theory has no biblical basis whatsoever. Paul says in Ephesians that Gentile believers become part of the "commonwealth of Israel", not that they become Israelites.

Third, absolutely believers should be obedient to Yeshua, but that doesn't imply being Torah observant, at least not in a rabbinical sense. The Torah as the constitution of Israel given at Mt. Sinai was broken. God's response is the New Covenant. We obey his eternal laws, which can be called "torah" in that "torah" means God's direction, but not in the sense of adhering to the covenant as given at Sinai.

tatankachief said...

My apologies for using the term Rabbi, of course you are right, only Yeshua is worthy of that title.

In my studies, I have found what I believe to be quite a bit of scripture that DOES indicate that the two house theory is biblically based and that the two houses will indeed be reunited when Yeshua returns. I know there are some that believe the houses have already been reunited, but I don't find definitive proof that they have been as of yet. As far as the 'Christian' world being comprised of the descendants, I've found no definitive scriptural basis for that.

You are certainly correct that Paul says in Ephesians that Gentile believers become part of the "commonwealth of Israel", not that they become Israelites. But given that he was the Apostle to the Gentiles of the time (the majority coming from pagan backgrounds), what did he teach them? Weren't Paul and the others directed to give the new believers a few basic instructions to begin with and then told to send them on to the Synagogues to learn the rest of God's instructions?

Your assertion that we should obey God's 'eternal' laws leaves me as mystified as a good Protestant minister telling me that I only need obey the 'moral' laws of God. I must ask you the same question I ask of him; Where do I find those laws / instructions. The eternal ones or the moral ones. It is my understanding that the originals (the ones given at Mt. Sinai) are eternal and moral. Where am I given the authority to pick and choose the instructions I should obey?

Shalom Alan,

Ran

Alan Gilman said...

My reference to the "two house theory" only has to do with the wrong notion that Gentile believers are actually from Ephraim. The Bible certainly teaches that God will remove all division from Israel.

The issues of which laws to keep is a difficult one. I don't trust anyone who claims they have an easy answer to this. The coming of the Messiah and the destruction of the Temple caused radical changes to the Mosaic covenant. No one actually keeps this covenant as originally given, since there is no Temple. The rabbis substituted all sorts of religious observances for the God-given ones. They know they can't keep the actual laws. So-called Torah-observant messianics fare no better.

Reading the New Testament, we see a grappling with the fulfillment of Jeremiah 31, where the Torah is internalized. Yeshua is the substance of Old Covenant forms, but as to righteous living, faithful followers of God continue to pursue his ways.

James' statement about the Gentiles and the synagogues is not clear. The interpretation you mention is highly unlikely since it contradicts the essence of what the apostles decided in their resolution of the conflict.

Please note that all comments are moderated. I have to approve them in order for them to be posted. If you want to continue this discussion, email would be better: info@torahbytes.org