The Lord spoke to
Moses, saying, “Send men to spy out the land of Canaan, which I am giving to
the people of Israel. From each tribe of their fathers you shall send a man,
every one a chief among them.” (Bemidbar / Numbers 13:1-2; ESV)
This passage
tells us that God initiated the plan to send in twelve scouts to check out the
land of Canaan prior to the planned conquest. Later in the Torah, the story
reads differently:
Then
all of you came near me and said, "Let us send men before us, that they
may explore the land for us and bring us word again of the way by which we must
go up and the cities into which we shall come." The thing seemed good to
me, and I took twelve men from you, one man from each tribe. (Devarim /
Deuteronomy 1:22-23; ESV)
This second
account sounds as if God wasn't involved at all. Here we are told that the
people initiated a plan that Moses approved. This kind of apparent
contradiction is one of the many proofs that the Bible is not contrived. No one
pretending to write true stories would do it this way. Yet, there is no problem
seeing the differing accounts as describing various aspects of the same story.
It appears that the people did make the suggestion. Moses, true to form, would
have asked God before giving the go ahead. So that when Moses says, "The
thing seemed good to me," it is based on God's approval. Therefore to
write, "the Lord spoke to Moses, saying," is an accurate description
of what happened.
So what we
have here is a suggestion on the part of the Israelites to check out the
Promised Land before beginning the process to acquire it. As it turned out, ten
of the scouts were overwhelmed by what they saw. The other two, Joshua and
Caleb, could not convince the people that God's presence with them was
sufficient to overcome the land's inhabitants. So the people rebelled against
God's directive to take the land at this time, desiring to appoint a new leader
and return to Egypt instead. God then judged the people by causing them to
wander in the wilderness for an additional 38 years until all the adults of the
current generation died out, all except for Joshua and Caleb.
The negative
reaction of the people to the scouts' report may lead us to conclude that their
suggestion to check out the land before attempting to enter it was a bad idea.
The problem with this conclusion is that God himself approved their plan. But
could this be an instance where God gave the people over to what their
unfaithful hearts wanted, allowing them to go their own foolish way, knowing it
would not go well? I don't think so, especially since 38 years later, before
the Israelites successfully entered the Land, Joshua also sent in scouts. The
results that time were very different.
So the
problem was not the strategy, but the conclusion. However, if God told the
people to acquire the land, then what purpose is there in sending in an advance
scouting party? Wouldn't the effect of their investigation be nothing more than
confusion? Doesn't faith require as little information about situations as
possible? Why cloud our minds with all sorts of facts and logistics? Why not
just trust God?
To think
that true faith requires ignorance with regard to the practical details of life
reveals a misunderstanding as to what true faith really is. Faith is not a
mindless floating through life, oblivious to reality. It is a dependency upon
God, resulting in intentional living. The scouts' issue was not that they had
too much information; it's that they didn't look at the information from a
perspective of faith in God. The people needed to know the obstacles and
challenges they faced, so that they could deal with them effectively. It's not
that they didn't require a strategy; it's that they needed to develop a
strategy based on the truth of who God is.
Faith is not
blind. In fact it requires great clarity. It is only when we truly trust God
that we are able to see the details of life for what they really are.